The Supreme Court is poised to strike down a federal law that prohibits states from recognizing same-sex marriages.
In a decision that is expected in the coming weeks, the justices could decide that same-seam marriages should be treated as legal, while also overturning a lower court ruling that struck down an Oregon law that required couples who are not legally married in other states to obtain state permission.
The court has not ruled on whether gay marriage is constitutional.
The decision is likely to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
If the justices rule in favor of gay marriage, it would open the door for hundreds of thousands of Americans to marry in states that have legalized it, such as Nevada, Utah and Wyoming.
For many Americans, however, the decision could have a profound impact on the way they conduct their weddings, their relationships and their families.
States that do not recognize same-dormancy marriages would be able to continue to enforce the federal ban, but the federal government would not be able impose its same-gender-marriage policies across the country.
For those states, the prospect of seeing a gay wedding is likely only one of many challenges to their gay marriage bans.
The decision would be a major victory for the LGBT community and could also spark calls for the passage of legislation in other state legislatures that would allow same-locker-room laws.
But as we enter a presidential campaign year in which the Supreme Judicial Court is expected to hear several gay-marriage cases, the court’s decision could also have major ramifications for the future of gay rights in America.
When the Supreme Courts strikes down a state law that bars same-day marriage in the future, it could set a precedent that would eventually make same-bed weddings legal nationwide.
It could also lead to a surge in same-night wedding ceremonies, which are a common occurrence among some gay couples.
While the court is likely not likely to strike it down completely, it has a long history of rulings that it has struck down as unconstitutional.
One such case was a 1954 ruling that said a state ban on interracial marriages was unconstitutional.
Another involved a 1954 decision that struck a ban on the federal recognition of marriage of same- and opposite-sex couples.
In 2000, the Supreme court struck down a Wisconsin law that denied state employees the right to use their state pension to support same- sex unions.
“It’s clear that this ruling will be seen as a victory for traditional marriage, a decision by the Supreme courts to recognize that marriage between a man and a woman is a fundamental right for every citizen,” said Robyn Greene, president of Equality Oregon.
“But it’s also clear that same sex marriage is a constitutional right, and that states should be able legally to do as they please.
And that’s not what’s happening.”
More from NBC News: